Skip to content
letmesettle

Who's right? Let me settle it.

Everyone in the argument adds their own side: WhatsApp chats, screenshots, voice notes. We read all of it and write a fair verdict, with the receipts.

  • 2 to 8 people, each with their own evidence
  • From ₹149, paid once, GST included
  • Deleted 24 hours after delivery

An example verdict

A Quick verdict (₹149) on a two-person case, as the people in it would see it. The names are made up. Tap any quote to see where it came from.

Quick verdictExample case

The ₹2,000 for the gig tickets

Heard 2 of 2 sides

  • Priya
  • Arjun

The ruling

Arjun should have paid by Friday like he promised. Priya's dig in the group chat went a step too far.

Mostly on ArjunMost of the fault is on one person.
  • Arjun70%
  • Priya30%

How sure: Sure. The promise and the reminders are in both sides' uploads. The call about salary day appears only in Arjun's typed account.

What would change this

  • A message from before Friday where Priya agrees to wait for Arjun's salary.
  • Proof the ₹2,000 was already sent another way, like a UPI screenshot.

What decided it

  1. On Tuesday night Arjun made a dated promise in his own words.

    No condition, no salary-day caveat. Friday was his deadline, not Priya's.

  2. Priya asked again on Saturday and Monday, politely and with the amount spelled out.

    By Wednesday her patience had run out, and Arjun's reply made it worse.

  3. The next morning Priya took it to the group.

    That turned a private reminder into a public jab, and it's most of her 30%.

Each side at its best

Notes on this report

  • Arjun's typed account says Priya knew about salary day from a phone call. No message confirms that, so it was read as his claim, not as evidence.

AI-generated opinion. Not legal advice, therapy or mediation.

Written 24 May 2026, 10:12 am. Quotes are copied word for word from the evidence, never typed by the AI.

How it works

Set up takes a few minutes. You only pay when you want the verdict.

  1. Everyone adds their side, privately

    Send a link and PIN on WhatsApp. Each person uploads their own chats, screenshots and voice notes. Nobody can read anyone else's side, not even their own once it's sent.

  2. We read everything

    Every screenshot, every exported chat, every voice note in Hindi, English or Hinglish. Lined up in the order it happened, with who said what.

  3. A fair verdict, with receipts

    A ruling, the fault split, and something specific each person got right. Every quote is word for word from the evidence, with the time it was sent.

The full walkthrough, with what happens to your evidence

A chatbot agrees with whoever is typing. We hear everyone first.

In a 2026 study published in Science, AI chatbots sided with the person asking 49% more often than people did. Ask one about a fight and you mostly get your own side back, nicely worded.

  • When everyone joins, each side adds their own evidence. A typed account never speaks for someone else.
  • Chats and recordings count as evidence. A typed account counts as a claim.
  • Before ruling, we check the verdict would be the same with the names swapped.
Asking a chatbot

My friend still hasn't paid his half for the tickets. Am I wrong to be annoyed?

You're completely right to feel that way, and you handled it really well. You deserve friends who respect you.

Heard 1 of 2 sides. Didn't see the group chat.

Let Me Settle

Mostly on Arjun, 70 to 30.

He promised "Friday tak pakka" and let three reminders sit. Priya's dig in the group chat the next morning is her 30%.

Heard 2 of 2 sides.

Your side stays yours. Then it's gone.

Sealed submissions

Others on the case see your name once you've submitted, never your evidence. You can't read it back either, so nobody can be made to show it.

Deleted after 24 hours

Uploads are deleted once they're processed. The report and its PDF are deleted 24 hours after delivery, with a countdown on the page.

No names on the share card

The report uses real names. The card you can post shows Side A and Side B, the split and the one-line ruling.

We list every AI provider we use and what each one keeps. Read the privacy page

Pricing

One payment per case. Anyone on the case can pay, and the first payment unlocks it for everyone.

Quick

₹149incl. GST

Two people, one argument.

Fits

  • 2 sides
  • 15 screenshots
  • 5 min of audio
  • 3,000 words
  • The ruling and the fault split
  • How sure we are, and what would change it
  • 2 or 3 deciding moments, with quotes
  • Each side at their best
  • One next step each
  • A share card with no names on it

Ready in about 2 to 3 minutes.

Most cases

Full

₹299incl. GST

Most fights land here. Up to four people.

Fits

  • Up to 4 sides
  • 50 screenshots
  • 20 min of audio
  • 20,000 words
  • Everything in Quick
  • Issue-by-issue rulings
  • A timeline of what happened
  • A section for each side: their case, where they're right, where they slipped
  • A message each person could send
  • PDF copy

Ready in about 4 to 5 minutes.

Deep

₹799incl. GST

Big groups, long histories. Up to eight people.

Fits

  • Up to 8 sides
  • 150 screenshots
  • 60 min of audio
  • 60,000 words
  • Everything in Full
  • A chapter for each side, every claim cited
  • What kept happening: the repeat patterns
  • Who owes whom, for groups of 3 or more
  • Evidence appendix

Ready in about 6 to 9 minutes.

You don't pick a tier. We count the evidence and the tier is set by whichever limit you reach first. More than 8 sides is Deep plus ₹99 for each extra side. One-time payments, no subscription.

Add-ons, after the verdict

Questions

Stop going in circles.

Start a case, invite the others, and see the price before you pay. No refunds for disagreeing, and we'll say that again next to the button.

Settle it

From ₹149, paid once. GST included.